A- de 2005
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra
✓Claimant Ciro Antonio Rojas Y Otro
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Inexistencia de la causal alegada en el ordenamiento jurídico
- Alcance del criterio de pertinencia
- Rechazar por impertinente
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- En merito de lo expuesto la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
- RESUELVE
- Primero. RECHAZAR POR IMPERTINENTE la recusacion presentada por los ciudadanos Ciro Antonio Rojas Agudelo y Orlando Neusa Forero contra el Magistrado Rodrigo Escobar Gil para conocer de la constitucionalidad del Proyecto de Ley Estatutaria 216 Senado 352 Camara "por la cual se regula la igualdad electoral entre los candidatos a la Presidencia de la Republica y demas materias establecidas en el Acto Legislativo No 02 de 2004".
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.